Subscribe to and Contact HDC

 HDC Feed

 HDC Comments Feed

HDC by Email

HDC Comments by Email

HDC on Facebook

~~
Email Heaving Dead Cats to share news, personal stories, ideas, information and more. I'd love to hear from you.

Our Cats

Dead Cats Archive

Ooh, Shiny!

You can support this site by making your Amazon purchases via the links below even if you don't buy these books! (it costs you nothing extra)

What I'm reading now:
The God Virus: How religion infects our lives and culture
God Hates You, Hate Him Back: Making Sense of The Bible by CJ Werleman
Microcosm: E. Coli and the New Science of Life (this is excellent. Well written and fascinating. Highly recommended)
God Is Not Great (Hitchens is extremely erudite but I agree with him a lot here. Excellent so far)
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark (Listening to the audio version. Excellent!)


What I just finished:
Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw Men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language
Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism (Recommended. The first half is a great read. Thorough and detailed but easy to understand.)
Letting Go of God (I listened to the audio version. It was poignant and funny. Highly recommended!)
His Dark Materials Trilogy (The Golden Compass; The Subtle Knife; The Amber Spyglass) (best trilogy I've ever read!)

Series

Happy Atheist Love

Logical Fallacy 1: Straw Man

This entry is part 2 of 19 in the series Logical Fallacies

This is Part 1 in a series I introduced yesterday about Logical Fallacies, Misconceptions, False Beliefs. We’re going to go through one fallacy a day (approximately). There are about 20 main fallacies altogether. I’m going to try to explain them with examples then find ways to help you refute those arguments when they occur.

Our first Logical Fallacy is the Straw Man Argument. This is a great one to start with on our journey because it’s quite common and easy to spot.

A straw man: a dummy stuffed with straw. It’s too weak to fight back.

Arguing against a position specifically created to be easy to argue against, rather than the position held by someone who opposes that point of view.

So, when you state your position, your opponent replies not to what you said, but to a distorted and exaggerated caricature of what you said, that is obviously harder to defend.

Example: You state your argument: People who commit minor offenses should be let out of jail sooner.
Opponent replies: Emptying out all the jails would create havoc in society.

While that may be true, it isn’t what you suggested. It’s irrelevant. Your opponent didn’t refute your point, he invented a different point that is easier to argue against. The opponent can take satisfaction in having a point that no reasonable person could argue with. He appears to have successfully defeated your argument when in fact he simply dodged it.
Example: You: I don’t believe in UFO’s based on the lack of evidence.
Opponent: You don’t believe in anything you can’t see with your own eyes. So air doesn’t exist because you can’t see it?

That isn’t true at all. Scientists accept logical inference as a legitimate method. I have never seen a black hole but I accept their reality because the evidence strongly infers their existence. I’ve never seen a proton or a neutron but I can infer their existence based on the findings of numerous scientists.

I’m using 2 great resources for these fallacy lessons, well, technically three.

I noticed while writing this one up that no one talks about simple, clear cut ways for refuting each kind of argument. I’ll look around for some examples and add them in as I find them. If you have any resources, please share with the class!

Ok, I talked to my husband, Butch, today and we hashed over what we thought would be a good plan for refuting this type of fallacy.

  1. Tell your opponent that his/her reply is the Straw Man Argument.
  2. Briefly explain the Straw Man Fallacy to the person.
  3. Restate your case in clear terms so that they understand where you’re coming from.
  4. Ask for a direct reply to your argument.

This is what makes sense to me. Helpful comments and suggestions are welcome, as well as other resources.

This is a series on Logic, Logical Thinking and Dealing with Logical Fallacies in an Argument. Visit the Logical Fallacies page to see them all.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm

Related posts

4 comments to Logical Fallacy 1: Straw Man

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>