Comments on: Holy Jesus In A Little Plastic Cup! How Convenient!

By: Neece

Neece — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:46:08 +0000

Ooh, thanks for the link, Johnny. That’s just awesome!

By: Neece

Neece — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:45:29 +0000

Wow… that’s wild! No, you’re not alone.

By: Johnny

Johnny — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:23:45 +0000

Aha!! LOL! HAHA HAHA (Created by Rev. C.S. Rowan at the FSM forums)

By: Taylor

Taylor — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:31:19 +0000

haha!! My mom has tons of these sitting around the house in neatly sealed ziplock bags, ready to go.
I’m glad to know I’m not the only one who finds these pretty silly

By: Neece

Neece — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:01:34 +0000

Well Phil, you’ve shown yourself to be a classless oaf. I think we’ve all had enough.

As far as I can tell, your ideas stem from baseless conjecture melded with lingering catholic beliefs. You’ve just reiterated your ideas without any facts or resources.

There is a lot of evidence that says that the christian mythos borrowed heavily from Mithras and other local cults and myths of the time.

I’ve seen Religulous. Not that it makes any difference to this conversation.

By: Phil E. Drifter

Phil E. Drifter — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:29:00 +0000

I don’t have any evidence that Jebus existed, Neece. At first I thought you were cute and I wanted to get in contact with you on the off chance that we could bone, but now this thread is just boring. Tell you the truth, just receiving reminders that I once traipsed across this thread every time someone posts a new comment is a pain in the ass.

Look, as far as I can tell, Mary (not her real name) convinced Joseph (not his real name) that he should play along and pretend ’she was carrying the son of god’ because she was raped by a roman centurion (soldier) and became pregnant (she was only 14 at the time) and the punishment in those days for pregnancy outside of wedlock was to be stoned to death (no, not that way…yes, that way). (THAT is what the RCC doesn’t want you to know.)

People didn’t just conjure up stories out of thin air, Neece. There was someone to whom they were referring when they talked about ‘Jebus.’ No he wasn’t the son of god. But they wrote about him because they were suppressed and that’s what religitards do when they get all emo: they write crap that sucks to everyone but themselves.

I suffered through 12 years of catholic school, I’m done talkin’ about this garbage (for now).

Buy, rent, borrow, or steal Bill Maher’s “Religulous”.

By: Neece

Neece — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:25:34 +0000

Phil, what evidence is there that Jesus existed, outside of the gospels? Josephus? He never claimed to have met Jesus. He only referenced Jesus twice. The first is disputed as forgery, if not at least altered, the second is a reference only. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus#Testimonium_Flavianum
The gospel writers? They wrote their stories 40-80 years after the supposed death of Jesus. They never met him either. No one even knows who those writers were.
Just because there are stories about him, it doesn’t mean that he existed. That’s like saying there are talking giant mice because there is so much evidence in modern culture of a talking 6 foot mouse named Mickey. There’s tons of evidence regarding him.
Name your sources, otherwise you’re just making up nonsense.