I just can’t improve on Pat Condell’s brilliance.
I’ve seen his videos in the past, but I didn’t realize he has been so prolific. (I know, I live under a rock). He did this latest video about a month ago and it’s awesome, as usual. I decided to do a transcript mainly for myself because I agreed with just about everything he said. So I thought I’d add it here. Thanks Pat, you really did nail what I think! 
Godless and Free by Pat Condell
Somebody pointed out to me recently that by focusing on what I don’t want, namely religion, I’m attracting more of it into my life, which I agree would be a very unfortunate irony if not for the fact that I’m focusing on what I do want, and that’s freedom, and lots of it. Read more…
(also called Appeal to Authority) Stating a claim is true because a person or group of perceived authority says it’s true. The claimant emphasizes the many years of experience and/or formal degrees held by the person or organization making the claim.
This argument is the opposite of the Ad Hominem Argument because the arguer appeals to positive characteristics of the source to support their argument, such as its perceived authority. If an advertisement shows someone wearing a white labcoat or a stern business suit, that is an appeal to authority.
This is Part 5 in a series I introduced the other day about Logical Fallacies, Misconceptions, False Beliefs. We’re going to go through one fallacy at a time. There are about 20 main fallacies altogether. I’m going to try to explain them with examples then find ways to help you refute those arguments when they occur.
While it’s reasonable to take into account the proper background of education and credentials, or to be suspicious of someone without such expertise, it must inevitably come down to logic and evidence to support the claim, not the person promoting it.
A good authority supports a position because there is evidence or other justifiable reasons that the argument merits, not the other way around. So, good scientists do not attach significance to their own authority. The theory needs to stand on its own and be peer reviewed. There is no need for an appeal to authority. Read more…
Facts, Freethinker, Ideas, Important, Think, advice, believing problem, clever, critical thinking, discussion, helpful stuff, logic, tips
A week ago I did a post called 50 Old Testament Inconsistencies. It was just something I thought might be a bit different to share with everyone. I didn’t write it but I linked to where I had found it and also to the Skeptic’s Annotated Bible’s list of contradictions. Apparently some people found it recently and it’s gotten some traffic, mainly by christians who are none too pleased. I guess I hit a nerve.
In my experience, most people don’t know how to argue effectively. I myself am not very good at it. I hate arguing, and conflict in general. But I think personal attacks are really uncalled for, especially when one person states an opinion and the other person counters with a personal attack. It just shows lack of ability to handle a disagreement.
By the way, this is called the Ad Hominem Logical Fallacy as I wrote about previously.
Sometimes I wonder if people do it on purpose because it’s so easy to lash out at someone and so hard to defend. I think they do, the more I see it happen. And frankly I think it’s weak and lazy. Read more…
Ideas, Important, Uncategorized, hypocrisy, interesting, randomness
Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Brilliant, Facts, Freethinker, Ideas, Penn & Teller, Quotes, Science, Skeptical, Think, advice, believing problem, blog, books, change, clever, cliches, critical thinking, faith, fun, history, humanity, humor, hypocrisy, interesting, knowledge, lies, lifestyle, logic, lord, money, morality, movie, movies, musing, mysticism, myth, neat, opinion, politics, power, religion
Today’s logical fallacy is also very common, in my experience. It’s called Ad Hominem, which is roughly translated from the Latin for “to the person.” It’s a personal attack against you instead of your argument. It can be subtle because it isn’t just that they call you a bad name, but they use a weakness or characteristic of you to imply that your argument is weak.
This is Part 2 in a series I introduced the other day about Logical Fallacies, Misconceptions, False Beliefs. We’re going to go through one fallacy at a time. There are about 20 main fallacies altogether. I’m going to try to explain them with examples then find ways to help you refute those arguments when they occur.
Example: You: I don’t believe in UFO’s.
Opponent: You’re so close minded!
Example: Opponent: I believe in UFO’s.
You: You’re crazy and/or stupid. Read more…
Facts, Freethinker, Ideas, Important, Think, advice, believing problem, clever, critical thinking, discussion, helpful stuff, logic, tips
Loading ...
Atheism, Brilliant, Freethinker, Ideas, Important, Think, advice, believing problem, critical thinking, helpful stuff, humanity, logic, religion, video
action, Atheism, belief, believing problem, catholic, common sense, faith, free, god, godless, help, humanity, pat condell, religion, Superstition, Think, thought, video
0